Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Parker v. U.S Marshals Service Eastern District of Virginia
as 1:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
U.S Marshals Service Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE THREE UNKNOWN NAMED DEPUTIES et al
as 3:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Orange County Jail Unknown Named Staff, Piedmont Regional Jail Unknown Name And Number Of Staff And Warden, Well Path Medical Services Of Piedmont Regional Jail And Unknown Name Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00572
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Stebbins v. Two Unknown Named Federal Agents of the U.S. Marshal Service
as 1:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Two Unknown Named Federal Agents of the U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nimashaun v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 2:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Deborah Nimashaun
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Director of U.S. Marshals Service
as 3:2010cv00390
Plaintiff:
Gary Buterra Williams
Defendant:
Director of U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 3:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Ramona Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
