Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Devin Wade v. U.S. Mint
as 5:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
U.S. Mint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 2:2022cv05234
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, U.S. MINT, PHILADELPHIA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY SECRETARY, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. $217,609.52 In Funds from Wells Fargo Account et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$217,609.52 in funds from Wells Fargo Account Ending 8961, $95,731.81 in funds from Wells Fargo Account ending 5813, $59,300 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
John Patrick Lopez, Roger Corrales and Beverly Corrales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Parker et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv01992
Defendant:
State of California, U.S. (Mint) Treasury and Sacramento County
Plaintiff:
The Fashion Forbes, Inc. and Akika Parker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
New Doe Child #1 et al v. Congress of the United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
New Doe Child #1 , New Doe Child #2 , New Doe Parent and others
Defendant:
Congress of the United States of America, United States of America, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Macconnell et al
as 3:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Rion Macconnell, Heather F Green and U.S Mint Green LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
