Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Podhorn, Jr. v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00418
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Podhorn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Butterworth v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv01884
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Leah Butterworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jalomo v. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2017cv00976
Defendant:
Damien Reyes, Individually, The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Human Services Officially, The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Ysaac Jalomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haqq v. U.S. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Hadi Abdul Haqq
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration and Unknown Agents/or Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kosa v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Stefan Kosa
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Watters v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00491
Plaintiff:
Patricia Watters
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Conerly v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Suaminka Conerly
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
Haqq v. U.S. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00479
Plaintiff:
Hadi Abdul Haqq
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Defendant:
U.S. Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
