Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United Parcel Service, Inc. et al v. Brendon Kennedy et al
as 5:2019cv00284
Defendant:
Mayumi Kennedy, Brendon Kennedy, UPS420 and others
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, United Parcel Service, Inc. (Delaware), United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
The UPS Store, Inc. v. Hagan
as 17-2749
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
The UPS Store, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Robert Hagan, Thomas Hagan, Ridge Assets, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
ABC CORPS 18 d/b/a "The UPS Store Centers 1768, 4386, 4419, 4769, 5158, 5472, 5979 and 6341", ABC CORP 37 d/b/a "The UPS Store Center 4768", Ketan Seth and others
Progressive Distribution Serv v. UPS, et al
as 16-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., a Michigan corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a publicly held company, a Delaware corporation, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., an Ohio corporation, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Progressive Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
The UPS Store, Inc. et al v. Hagan et al
as 1:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
The UPS Store, Inc. , United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Hagan , Thomas Hagan , Ridge Assets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sharpe et al v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 2:2009cv00813
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Sharpe and Health Care Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
