Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kaufman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv12198
Plaintiff:
Kory Kaufman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Castanon v. United Parcel Service, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv11679
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castanon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc and Robert Rankin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Castanon v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11942
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castanon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Robert Rankin and General Teamsters Local Union No. 406
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2021mc51017
Applicant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
