Cases 1 - 10 of 24
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Molina v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robert Molina
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ward
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 1:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark J. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cesare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Quay et al
as 1:2017cv02744
Defendant:
Official Jane Doe, Lt. John Doe and Warden Herman Quay
Plaintiff:
Rafael Lopez
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. FBI et al
as 1:2017cv02816
Plaintiff:
Pierre E. Dawson
Defendant:
FBI, DEA and United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
