Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jacobs Project Management Co v. DOI, et al
as 22-1147
Petitioner:
JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN R. WEBER
Browne v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Edwards Browne and Edward Browne
Defendant:
The Honorable Merrick Garland, United States Department of Interior and The Honorable Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2018cv09561
Plaintiff:
KENNY DURAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, THE STATUE OF LIBERTY-ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Wilby Barnett, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior
as 14-4401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBY BARNETT and JACQUALINE MORGAN BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Frederick Banks v. Secretary Interior
as 14-1213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Barnett et al v. United States Department of Interior, National Park Service
as 3:2012cv01653
Plaintiff:
Wilby Barnett and Jacqualine Morgan Barnett
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DESRIVIERES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv03622
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRE DESRIVIERES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and NATIONAL PARK SERVICE RANGER MICHAEL KLUBEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Friends of Animals, et al v. Superintendent Valley Fordge N, et al
as 12-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS and COMPASSION FOR ANIMALS, RESPECT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT VALLEY FORDGE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
