Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Colin Scholl, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
as 20-17077
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: JOHN GALVAN and PATRICK TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee: COLIN SCHOLL and LISA STRAWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Colin Scholl, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
as 20-16963
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: JOHN GALVAN and PATRICK TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee: COLIN SCHOLL and LISA STRAWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Boylan v. Morgan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01967
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, The Unites States Department of the Treasury, Does 1 Through 100 and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas A. Boylan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Colin Scholl, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
as 20-16915
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: JOHN GALVAN and PATRICK TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee: COLIN SCHOLL and LISA STRAWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor: JEFFREY OLSON
Jane Doe, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-56019
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his individual and official capacity as President of the United States, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his individual and official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Andrew Rudick v. The United States Department of the Treasury
as 2:2020cv07634
Plaintiff: Andrew Rudick
Defendant: The United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ronnie Shahar v. United States Department of the Treasury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03003
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Bureau of the Mint, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Plaintiff: Ronnie Shahar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
The Center for Investigative Reporting et al v. United States Department of the Treasury We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08181
Plaintiff: The Center for Investigative Reporting and Aaron Glantz
Defendant: Treasury, Dept of and United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?