Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01360
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beth Drake, Donald J Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathanael Reynolds v. United States District Court, et al
as 17-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant - Appellee:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge and Bruce Howe Hendricks, Judge
REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, MARY GORDON BAKER and BRUCE HOWE HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Don Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson
as 16-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
BLUESTEIN, NICHOLS, THOMPSON AND DELGADO, LLC, JOHN S NICHOLS, (individually), STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Nathanael Reynolds v. Shiva Hodges, et al
as 16-5152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant - Appellee:
Shiva V. Hodges, Magistrate Judge, Mary Geiger Lewis, Judge and United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Terrence Wright El v. Charleston County
as 15-7079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE WRIGHT EL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLESTON COUNTY GENERAL SESSIONS COURT and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Don Boyd v. Angelica Textile Service
as 12-7343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELICA TEXTILE SERVICES, FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP, REYBURN WILLIAMS LOMINACK, III and others
Bell Aerospace Services, Inc. v. U.S. Aero Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00141
Amicu:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
Robert Green
Defendant:
Frank Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
