Cases 1 - 10 of 49
William Lopez vs. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05179
Plaintiff:
William Murial Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spicer v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02057
Petitioner:
Sunny Spicer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aaron Maurice Blaylock v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Aaron Maurice Blaylock
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv06078
Petitioner:
Henry Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clervrain v. Wilson et al
as 2:2020cv02061
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Raquel Wilson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Does Other Agencies of United States of America; Doctor Krystal, Amanda Granger and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02012
Petitioner:
Robert Cotner
Respondent:
United States of America and Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Qumbargi v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv00137
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Haitham Qumbargi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornsberry v. Green et al
as 5:2016cv05281
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thornsberry
Defendant:
Robin Green, Carrie Dobbs, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Resendez v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02184
Petitioner:
Esmeralda Resendez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
