Cases 31 - 40 of 51
United States of America v. Approximately $49,849.02 in Funds et al
as 3:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $49,849.02 in Funds, Approximately $5,559 in United States Currency and Two United States Postal Service Money Orders
Claimant:
Pawnee Leasing Corporation and Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Crossley v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv00193
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
David B. Crossley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Crossley v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv00165
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
David B. Crossley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Krings v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
William Mark Krings
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Aquisha Woolard Carr
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Reaves v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Cherry Reaves
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Charlotte Housing Authority and Youth and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
COLEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
J.W. COLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Faircloth v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2011cv00465
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Myra W. Bell , Christopher X. Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Faircloth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
