Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MATRAJT et al v. THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01660
Defendant:
BRIAN W. GRAY, NICHOLAS CAPACCIO, ALEXIS ZELLEFROW and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DEHAVEN and DIEGO TOBIAS MATRAJT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES et al
as 5:2015cv06360
Petitioner:
JOSEPH LUIS RAMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES, SANDRA BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goode v. Baltimore City Circuit Court et al
as 4:2015cv01351
Plaintiff:
Abraham Goode
Defendant:
Baltimore City Circuit Court, Unknown Baltimore City Police Officers, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRUBER v. UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014mc00036
Petitioner:
LUKE ADAM GRUBER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER FRED CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv02697
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, An unknown named Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYARD v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2013cv01486
Petitioner:
SERGE ERIC BAYARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
