Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville
as 14-7180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Mercer v. Dempster et al
as 3:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Mercer
Defendant:
Jeremy Paul Dempster, Johnnie W. Dempster, II, Nicole M. Dempster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 14-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. J. Barefoot
as 14-6220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAREFOOT, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Karl Masek v. Los Angeles Metro Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2014cv00798
Defendant:
Board of Secretary, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Masek
Robert Bailey v. J. Barefoot
as 13-7797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAREFOOT, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. NC DMV
as 13-7648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Vehicles License and Theft Division, JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
