Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Robinson v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2019cv03768
Defendant:
Nurse Lidia, Walter Nicholson and Unknown John Doe's
Plaintiff:
Rickey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Cermak Hospital Health Services et al
as 1:2019cv02220
Defendant:
Jamie, PT, Cermak Hospital Health Services, Unknown John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Bibiano Favela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv07144
Plaintiff:
Derrick Morgan
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Randy Pfister, E. Aguinaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Unknown John Doe Officers
as 1:2018cv04698
Defendant:
UNKNOWN JOHN DOE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
Starr Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08500
Plaintiff:
Julius J. Harang , Norbert Hennrich , Betsy Hennrich and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Robey v. Unknown John Doe Police Officers
as 1:2017cv02378
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Robey
Defendant:
Unknown John Doe Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newsome v. Madison County, Illinois et al
as 3:2016cv01103
Plaintiff:
Tilia Newsome
Defendant:
Madison County, Illinois , Madison County, Illinois Sheriff's Office and Unknown John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Curry v. Does
as 1:2015cv09152
Plaintiff:
Dannielle Curry
Defendant:
Unknown John Doe Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Niton et al v. Village of Oak Lawn et al
as 1:2015cv05750
Plaintiff:
Piotr Niton and Anna Niton
Defendant:
Village of Oak Lawn , Oak Lawn Police Officer James S Mitchell, Star #2232 , Oak Lawn Police Officer Timothy A. Thomas, Star #2219 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
