Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sutter v. UPMC et al
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Sutter
Defendant:
UPMC, UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kenyon v. Guiteriez et al
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenyon
Defendant:
Dr. Julian Guiteriez, Dr. Shaihk Arif, Patricia Comer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Kodenkandeth v. UPMC Health Plan Inc, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KODENKANDETH
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN INC, DBA UPMC for Life, UPM CORPORATE HOLDING CO, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS SERVICE and others
Jeffrey Gibson v. United States Federal Reserve, et al
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GIBSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PINNACLE HEALTH UPMC and others
McMullen v. Harrisburg Capitol Police et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael McMullen
Defendant:
Harrisburg Capitol Police, Officer John Doe and UPMC Harrisburg Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
