Cases 1 - 10 of 506
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Edwards v. UPS et al,.
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
UPS, United Parcel Services, Inc, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VPR Brands, LP v. Re-Up Vapes Inc.
as 8:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
VPR Brands, LP
Defendant:
Re-Up Vapes Inc. dba elfbars.com doing business as ELFBARS.COM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc v. National Labor Relations Board
as 24-1981
Petitioner:
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Barnes v. UPS et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
UPS, UPS Beoing Field and UPS Seattle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Harris v. Perez, et al.
as 24-955
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
JOSE PEREZ, JOHN/JANE DOE, Arresting Officer, Tulalip Police Department, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, Back up Officer, Tulalip Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
