Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McDowell v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 4:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
William McDowell
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a UPS; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, United Parcel Service, Inc. doing business as UPS, United Parcel Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Warren v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00007
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harold Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solis v. UPS Ground Freight Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00722
Plaintiff:
Henry Solis
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight Inc and Paul Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brantley v. UPS Ground Freight Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Kimberley D Brantley
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight Inc, Optimum Staffing Inc, Robert L Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolores Comstock v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc., et al
as 13-2773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dolores Comstock, Special Administrator of the Estate of William Gumby
Defendant - Appellee:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Allen Howard
Bundy et al v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
Larry Bundy and Rhonda Bundy
Defendant:
David Hawkins and UPS Ground Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gumby v. UPS Ground Freight Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
William Gumby
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight Inc and Allen Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Donna Pierce
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., PPD Property, Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Barkwell v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00405
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Barkwell
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc., Worldwide Dedicated Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
