Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-03576
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and The UPS Store, Inc.
Tucker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03576
Plaintiff:
Lynn W. Tucker
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and The UPS Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joynes v. State Farm Insurance Companies et al
as 4:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Robert P Joynes
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Companies, Terry Barton, Steven P DeVolder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viboonvoradej v. Brainis et al
as 3:2014cv05039
Plaintiff:
Shakris Viboonvoradej
Defendant:
Ben Brainis, Stanley Thomas and UPS Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Liping Luo et al v. The UPS Store, Inc.
as 1:2014cv05318
Plaintiff:
Global Access Enterprises, Inc. and Liping Luo
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The UPS Store, Inc. et al v. Hagan et al
as 1:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
The UPS Store, Inc. , United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Hagan , Thomas Hagan , Ridge Assets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
UPS Store, Inc. v. Persepolis Enterprises Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13810
Plaintiff:
UPS Store, Inc.
Defendant:
Persepolis Enterprises Inc. and Pezhman Afrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPPUZZO v. UPS STORE, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv07093
Plaintiff:
JAMES CAPPUZZO
Defendant:
UPS STORE, INC. , MAIL BOXES ETC., INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
The UPS Store, Inc. et al v. Cappuzzo
as 3:2012cv02740
Plaintiff:
The UPS Store, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Defendant:
James Cappuzzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
