Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest v. Sabre Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02725
Plaintiff:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Petitioner:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., oneworld Management Company, Inc., Expedia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Inc., Sabre Travel International Limited and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Carlson Wagonlit Travel
Not Classified By Court:
Brussels Airlines N.V., Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. and Austrian Airlines AG
Interested Party:
Farelogix and Travelport L.P.
Amicus Curiae:
Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Inc., Virgin America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Gluth v. American Airlines, Inc. f/k/a US Airways, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00918
Plaintiff:
Garrett Gluth
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Airways, Inc., for American v. Sabre Holdings Corporation
as 17-983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Defendant / Appellee:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Travel International Limited and Sabre GLBL Inc.
Defendant:
Sabre Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Travelers United, Inc., David S. Evans, Professor Richard Schmalensee and others
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02139
Defendant:
Wolverine Worldwide Flexible Spending Account Plan, Monrovia Nursery Company Employee Benefit Plan, Future Electronics Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
West Hills Surgery Center LLC, San Joaquin Valley Surgery Center LLC, Palmdale Surgery Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gluth v. American Airlines, Inc., f/k/a US Airways, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Garrett Gluth
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., f/k/a US Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gluth v. American Airlines, Inc., f/k/a US Airways, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
Garrett Gluth
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., f/k/a US Airways, Inc., American Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Carolyn Fjord
as 19-513
Petitioner:
Gail S. Kosach, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-0270, Lisa McCarthy, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-0270, J. Michael Walker, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-027 and others
Respondent:
US Airways, Inc., Kobre & Kim LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022, US Airways Group, Inc., American Airlines, Inc. and others
In Re: September 11 Property Damage and Business Loss Litigation
as 1:2021mc00101
Defendant:
Syska & Hennessy Group, Inc., Flack & Kurtz, Inc., Riggs National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, Compagnie Generale De Reassurance De Monte Carlo, Koudis International, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Massachusetts Port Authority, Colgan Air Inc. and United Air Lines, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
80 Lafayette Associates, L.L.C., Espeed, Inc., Cantor Index Limited and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Burns International Security Services Corp., AMR Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Hitchcock & Cummings, LLP and Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Airports Council International - North America
Intervenor:
The New York Times Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
TIG Insurance Company
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
