Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv13359
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BAHP, US ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIGBEKAEN v. HURWITZ et al
as 1:2020cv01517
Defendant:
E. BRADLY, US ATTORNEY OFFICE BALTIMORE, HURWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00915
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ROA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2018cv12652
Plaintiff:
BRUNILDA ROA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Clark v. US Attorney Office
as 3:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
US Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walborn v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Richard Walborn
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and US Attorney's Office Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Markardt v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Anne Pauline Markardt
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Amicu:
The Attorney General of the United States and US Attorney's Office Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHAH et al v. STATE OF WISCONSIN et al
as 3:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
I. SHAH, A. SHAH and FAMILY
Defendant:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DEC et al v. DOUBLE et al
as 2:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC and LISA A. (WEISENSTEIN) DEC
Defendant:
JILL DOUBLE, T&R PROPERTIES, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
