Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Azcona v. State of NJ et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Daniel Azcona
Defendant:
State of NJ, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., NJ DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. PASERALLI et al
as 2:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY PASERALLI, SGT WAGNER, ASHLEY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Kaetz v. Unknown US Marshals, et al
as 22-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN US MARSHALS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MATTHEW A. HOHMAN and others
BANKS v. JUSTICES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2020cv00590
Respondent:
TODD, BAER, DOUGHERTY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court et al
as 1:2020cv00660
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Warden Allegheny County Jail, Hon. Dougherty and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Turkey et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Syria, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2019cv01169
Respondent:
ASIA YOUNG, DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Banks v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01237
Defendant:
Asia Young, Warden Orlando Harper, Caitlyn Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHAELS v. MADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY JAIL, US MARSHALL PENNSYLVANIA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS and JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
