Cases 1 - 10 of 17
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Mahoning County Sheriff et al
as 4:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Keith M. Wagner
Respondent:
Mahoning County Sheriff and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerdine v. Barr, et al.
as 4:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jerdine
Defendant:
Barr, Robin K. Grimes, US Marshal ND of Ohio and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Lewis Jerdine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 4:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. US Marshals Services
as 5:2019cv02648
Defendant:
US Marshals Services
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv00845
Defendant:
US Marshalls, Department of Justice & Ohio DOJ, Ross County, OH and others
Plaintiff:
Randy G. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bielicki v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al.
as 4:2016cv02677
Plaintiff:
Jason Bielicki
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal , Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al.
as 4:2016cv01529
Plaintiff:
Alex Cook
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01207
Petitioner:
Douglas Reed
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tetter v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
David Tetter
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Steven Merlack and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
