Cases 1 - 10 of 100
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-2030
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E. SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL EDUCATION FUND, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL HAYES, SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS and others
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR ELECTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH, CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTION OFFICIALS, WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN and others
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-2029
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E. SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL EDUCATION FUND, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, US POSTAL SERVICE, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL HAYES, SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, NATIONAL SECURITY LEADERS FOR AMERICA and others
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR ELECTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH, CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTION OFFICIALS, WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN and others
State of California, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-2032
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
State of California, et al v. USPS, et al
as 26-2031
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE, DAVID STEINER, in the official capacity as Postmaster General, Chief Executive Officer of the Postal Service, and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors, DOUGLAS TULINO, in the official capacity as Deputy Postmaster General, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Postal Service and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1988
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E. SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL EDUCATION FUND, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, US POSTAL SERVICE, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, BIPARTISAN FORMER GOVERNORS, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS and others
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR ELECTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH, CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTION OFFICIALS, WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN and others
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-1989
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E. SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL EDUCATION FUND, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR ELECTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH, CURRENT AND FORMER ELECTION OFFICIALS, WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN and others
State of California, et al v. USPS, et al
as 26-1987
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE, DAVID STEINER, in the official capacity as Postmaster General, Chief Executive Officer of the Postal Service, and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors, DOUGLAS TULINO, in the official capacity as Deputy Postmaster General, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Postal Service and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
State of California, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-1991
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1774
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in the official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General, DEREK T. KAN, in the official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Interested Party:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan, BOSTON, MA and others
Amicus Curiae:
JERRY BROWN, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, KATE BROWN and others
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1779
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
Amicus Curiae:
JERRY BROWN, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, KATE BROWN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
