Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,832
Matthews v. USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Louis Matthews
Defendant: USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(HC) Chen v. Warden, USP Atwater We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner: Jia Wu Chen
Respondent: Warden, USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff: TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Kenneth Reid v. Garza
as 24-1181
Plaintiff: KENNETH R. REID
Defendant: WARDEN GARZA, USP-Canaan
Ronald Goodloe v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 24-1170
Plaintiff: RONALD E. GOODLOE
Defendant: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Norvell Andrew v. Warden Jacob Doerer
as 5:2024cv00198
Petitioner: Norvell Andrew
Respondent: Warden USP Victorville and Warden Jacob Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ulmer v. Warden, USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner: Jerry Ben Ulmer
Respondent: Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner: Jerome Richardson
Respondent: Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)McCoy v. Warden at USP Atwater We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner: Reggie L. McCoy
Respondent: Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?