Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50108
Plaintiff: Arrington Oliver
Defendant: David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v. USP Thomson et al
as 3:2021cv50362
Plaintiff: Johnnie Banks
Defendant: USP Thomson, S. Dessing, Lt. Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Thomson USP
as 3:2021cv50249
Defendant: Thomson USP
Plaintiff: Donta Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downey v. Ciolli We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv50196
Respondent: USP Thomson and Andrew Ciolli
Petitioner: Tyrence Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Thomson USP Federal Penn. et al
as 3:2021cv50197
Defendant: Grayson, Russel, Thomson USP Federal Penn. and others
Plaintiff: Ricky Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oscar v. Warden of USP-Thomson
as 3:2021cv50161
Petitioner: Jean Erole Oscar
Respondent: Warden of USP-Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lee v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50143
Petitioner: Mario Anton Lee
Respondent: Warden USP Thomson and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bussie et al v. Warden at USP Marion, Ill et al
as 1:2021cv01572
Petitioner: Anthony Bussie and Ceasar Sayoc
Respondent: Judge Jeb Rakoff and Warden at USP Marion, Ill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doctor v. Thomson USP Illinois We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv50117
Petitioner: Kareem A. Doctor and Kareem Antwan Doctor
Respondent: Thomson USP illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50104
Respondent: Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?