Cases 1 - 9 of 9
American Accessories Intl v. Conopco, Inc., et al
as 17-5073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN ACCESSORIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CONOPCO, INC., dba Unilver and UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
McClatcher et al v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mary L McClatcher and James McClatcher
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
American Accessories International, LLC v. Conopco, Inc et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
American Accessories International, LLC
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc and Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Procter & Gamble Company v. Conopco, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Procter & Gamble Company
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Naiser et al v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Terri Naiser and Jonnie Phillips
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. , LEK, Inc. and Conopco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Barbara Wilson v. Unilever United States Inc
as 3:2013cv00112
Defendant:
Unilever United States Inc
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hilling et al v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Charles Hilling , Tamara Hilling and Sydney Hilling
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. , John Doe (1-3) and ABC Coporations (1-3)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kevin Todd v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 12-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., aka Unilever Supply Chain, Inc., aka Ragu Foods Company
Todd v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kevin Todd
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
