Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Danner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05544
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant: David W Danner and Ann Rendahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant: Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant: Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant: Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. CSBE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-17130
Plaintiff - Appellee: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, DAVID J. GAU, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the California State Board of Equalization, GEORGE RUNNER and others
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. California State Board of Equalization, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv04311
Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant: California State Board of Equalization , David J. Gau , George Runner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Association of American Railroads et al v. California Office of Spill Prevention and Response et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02354
Plaintiff: Association of American Railroads , Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Defendant: California Office of Spill Prevention and Response , Thomas M. Cullen, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Association of American Railroads et al v. California Office of Spill Prevention and Response et al
as 2:2014at01262
Plaintiff: Association of American Railroads, Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Defendant: California Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Thomas M. Cullen, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Lori Swanson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2784
Plaintiff - Appellant: BNSF Railway Company, Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellee: Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Association of Ameri, et al v. South Coast Air Qual, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-55804
Plaintiff - Appellee: ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and GOVERNING BOARD OF SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Amicus Curiae: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and EAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?