Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Stovall v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2019cv05196
Defendant: City Of Chicago, John Doe 2, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff: Precious Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2017cv00964
Defendant: Jose Gil, Craig Smith, Luke Trapp and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Montes
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101 Federal Railroad Authorization Act of 1994
Angel Lomeli v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00146
Defendant: Does and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Angel Lomeli
Garrido v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2015cv03165
Plaintiff: Ronald Garrido
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv06456
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Carl A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 15-2059
Petitioner - Appellant: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Respondent - Appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03908
Plaintiff: James E Jones
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard T Poe et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2013cv01530
Defendant: County of Riverside, Does, Richard A Poe and others
Plaintiff: Richard T Poe and Robin Rotell
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013mc00022
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miguel Torres v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2013cv00945
Defendant: Does and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Miguel Torres

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?