Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Johnson v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-41
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, Director of ADOC, THOMAS HIGGINSON, Deputy Warden, SHANNON THIELMAN, Deputy Warden and others
Thomas Bastian v. Rondald Evans, et al
as 23-15012
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS O. BASTIAN
Defendant / Appellee: RONDALD EVANS, Deputy Warden at ADCCR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, BETTY ULIBERRI-RUIZ, Paralegal at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, R SILVA, COIV/ Disciplinary Hearing Office at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex and others
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee: VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 22-35699
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES
Defendant / Appellee: M. ROJAS, In her official and individual capacity as law librarian of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, PAYNTER, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Officer-in-Charge of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, HOUSTON, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Reviewing Officer of Misconduct Report at the Snake River Correctional Institution and others
Ford v. Calipatria State Prison et al
as 2:2021cv08723
Plaintiff: Marcel Douglas Ford
Defendant: Calipatria State Prison, State of California, Lieutenant Cowey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael L. Davis v. USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on 12/13/2019 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01551
Petitioner: Michael L. Davis
Respondent: USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on and Elizee Ben-Shmuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on 12/13/2019 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05654
Plaintiff: Michael L. Davis
Defendant: USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on and Elizee Ben-Shmuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Vanaman v. Christopher Marlow, et al
as 21-15645
Defendant / Appellee: MITCHELL, Unknown; legal assistant to Ms. Talpelcido at USP Tucson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAWSON, Unknown; Lieutenant who directs officers at USP Tucson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESLIE GREY VANAMAN
Adam Nunez v. Pinal County Sheriff's Office, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15225
Defendant: R. FERNANDO, #2259; Police Officer with Casa Grande Police Department, CASA GRANDE CITY POLICE, public law enforcers, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as "The City of Casa Grande, The Officers with the capacity of Supervisor's, Municipal Corporation" and others
Defendant / Appellee: RUSTY FERNANDO, #2259 Officer with Pinal County Sheriff Department, PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a municipal corporation and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as three other G.O.S.T. unit officers, public law enforcement officers, Pinal County Sheriff/Casa Grande City
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM ROBERT NUNEZ
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 19-35594
Defendant / Appellee: J. HOLLOPETER, In his Official and Individual Corridor Officer on Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BILL DOMAN, in his official and individual capacity as acting assistant superintendent of correctional rehabilitation and senior supervisor of law library services and M. Rojas and H. Mackenzie at the Snake River Correctional Institution, MARK NOOTH, in his individual and official capacity as eastside institution administrator of the Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, AKA Charles J. Johnson, AKA Charles James Johnson, AKA Asmar H. Saleem, AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?