Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Biton v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv11960
Plaintiff:
Marcelle Crystal Biton and Saphyre Redford
Defendant:
James/Jeffrey Hubbard, Homeland Security, Weitz & Luxenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danielle Biton v. USA, et al
as 19-1942
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE BITON
Scotto v. European Banking Authority et al
as 1:2018cv07563
Defendant:
Department of Social Security Administration, European Banking Authority, Microsoft and others
Plaintiff:
Livia Mary Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scotto v. United States et al
as 8:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Education, EDFIOAManager@us.ed.gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BITON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv01764
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Plaintiff:
BITON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Crystal Biton, et al v. United Continental Airlines, et al
as 13-3188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRYSTAL BITON, a/k/a Saphyre M.G. Redford, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
BITON et al v. UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
as 2:2011cv05106
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BITON, CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON and DANIELLE BITON
Defendant:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, DWECK, ADRIANNE MAIDENBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Heinemann v. United Continental Airline
as 11-35540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE HEINEMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Heinemann v. United Airlines
as 2:2011cv00002
Defendant:
United Continental Airlines
Plaintiff:
Theodore Heinemann
Counter_claimant:
United Continental Airlines
Counter_defendant:
Theodore Heinemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
