Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HARRIS et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2018cv02277
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith, CYNTHIA HARRIS and Devin Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02117
Plaintiff:
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, UPS CARTAGE SERVICES, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., UPS CARTAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN HALLMARK INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOREE v. MYERS et al.
as 1:2018cv02118
Plaintiff:
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, UPS CARTAGE SERVICES, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and MELVIN GENE FOREE
Defendant:
AMERICAN HALLMARK INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, PATTENGAL, CORIZON MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MELNIK et al v. POWELL et al
as 2:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDR MELNIK and MARIYA MELNIK
Defendant:
JAMES E POWELL and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
