Cases 31 - 40 of 291
Norwood v. United Parcel Service
as 21-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN NORWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2021mc51017
Applicant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Earl Cook v. UPS
as 21-1693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Tyrone Doutherd v. UPS, et al
as 21-15966
Defendant:
ESTATE OF LUCILLE J. SMITH, DORIS MARIE MONTESDEOCA and HARMONY HOME CARE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE DOUTHERD
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Jay Hannah v. UPS
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY HANNAH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Kyle Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 21-11915
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL OLIVERA, an individual, THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, by and through its Personal Representative Gail Olivera, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Daniel Minix v. UPS, et al
as 21-5402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MINIX
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 651 and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Ryan Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 21-11267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Mayfield v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Mike Mayfield
Defendant:
Cinderon LLC doing business as UPS Store #6953 and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00855
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
