Cases 1 - 10 of 2,276
O'Reilly v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Conor Patrick O'Reilly
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Edwards v. UPS et al,.
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
UPS, United Parcel Services, Inc, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Edwards v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024at00554
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barrett v. Local 804 Union of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)
as 24-1139
Plaintiff:
JAHMIL O. BARRETT
Defendant:
LOCAL 804 UNION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS (IBT) and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
