Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Aarow Contracting, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
as 8:2019cv00692
Plaintiff:
United States ex rel Aarow Contracting, Inc. and Aarow Contracting, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
U. S. ex rel. Szymoniak v. American Home Mortgage Serv
as 15-1720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. LYNN E. SZYMONIAK
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. LYNN E. SZYMONIAK
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INCORPORATED, SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Citi Residential Lending Inc., f/k/a AMC Mortgage Services Inc., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, d/b/a America's Servicing Company, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, as successor in interest to Lasalle Bank and others
Party-in-Interest:
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC
:
United States ex rel Costello Industries, Inc.
as 7:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
United States ex rel Costello Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States, ex rel. CTI Consultants, Inc. v. Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
United States, ex rel. CTI Consultants, Inc., United States, ex rel. CTI Consultants, Inc. and United States, ex rel. CTI Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Rory Mayberry v. Michael Battles
as 08-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY MAYBERRY, United States ex rel. and ROBERT ISAKSON, United States ex rel.
Party-in-Interest - None:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BATTLES, SECURITY VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED, DANUBIA GLOBAL, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - None:
EMERGENT BUSINESS SERVICES, TARHEEL TRAINING, LLC, ROB ROY TRUMBLE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CUSTER BATTLES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
