Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Flora Braziel v. United States Attorney's Offi, et al
as 15-3409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORA BRAZIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and JOSEPH A. STEWART
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flournoy, Michael v. McKenzie, John et al
as 3:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Flournoy
Defendant:
John G. McKenzie , United States Attorney Office NDI-WD , Thomas G. Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Taras v. James Foreman, et al
as 14-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TARAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. FOREMAN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ST. LOUIS SECRET SERVICE and others
Michael Verburg v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 14-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VERBURG
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina
VERBERG v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2013cv00418
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VERBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flora Braziel v. United States Attorney's Offi
as 13-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORA BRAZIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Financial Litigation Unit
Braziel v. United States Attorney's Office
as 1:2013cv00778
Plaintiff:
Flora Braziel
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Hardimon et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
John M Hardimon and Sarah Z. McBride
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigative, United States Human and Health Services, OIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
