Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ronnie Shahar v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2020cv03003
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Bureau of the Mint, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Shahar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv08911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Portland Mint, et al v. United States Department of Tr, et al
as 17-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORTLAND MINT, An Oregon Limited Liability Company and RONNIE SHAHAR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
PORTLAND MINT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND MINT and RONNIE SHAHAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BRAMLETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
KENT BRAMLETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
WEALTHY MAX LIMITED v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2015cv05875
Plaintiff:
WEALTHY MAX LIMITED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Lawrence et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
Randall Lawrence and Michael McConnell
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury , United States Bureau of the Mint and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
