Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cui v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Peter Markus and Ling Cui
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Merrick Garland, SEAN COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Reyes v. The United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice, The State of Alabama, The State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2020cv02026
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office et al
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Reno L Pearson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office, United States Department of Justice and Federal Correctional Complex Low
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe et al v. United States Department of Justice et al(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv01056
Plaintiff:
Phillippi S. Lowe and ElecChem New Space and Medical Technology Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Eric Holder, James M. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
Yakemi Kyienaedra Ward
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, M. Tatum, H. Crosthwait and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. The United States Department of Justice
as 3:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Williams
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dumonde v. United States Department of Justice et al (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Michael Mukasey and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
