Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Brantley v. United States Government, et al
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Harris Brantley
Defendant:
United States Government and Canadian Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00204
Respondent:
Unknown Named "Contract-Medical", Mitchell Dyer, S. Lynch and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moler v. Potter et al
as 6:2019cv00205
Respondent:
Benjamin Steven Potter, United States Government and Unknown Named "Property-Guards"
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
South Central Bank, Inc. v. United States Government, Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2019cv00247
Defendant:
Jessica Schigur, Joseph Schigur, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
South Central Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Buchanan v. United States Government
as 1:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
John David Buchanan
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Buchanan v. United States Government
as 1:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
John David Buchanan
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ray
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Kentucky, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States Government
as 0:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Santa Roy Allen Clark
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. United States Government
as 5:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Hobson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. United States Government
as 5:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Hobson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
