Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Granville Scruggs, II v. US Bureau of Engraving, et al
as 19-60139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRANVILLE SCRUGGS, II, United States Citizen
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS OFFICE and others
Alisha Morris-O'Brien v. Endicott, et al
as 17-11333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALISHA MORRIS-O'BRIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORAL ENDICOTT, BEN, JACKIE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00450
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cedric Nickerson v. U. S. Marshall's Office
as 13-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON, also known as Cedric Webb
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALL'S OFFICE, Lubbock Division
Bedford v. St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2012cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bedford
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, United States Marshal's Office and Robert C Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turpin v. The United States District Court et al
as 2:2011cv00183
Petitioner:
Maurice Turpin
Respondent:
The United States District Court, The United States Marshals Office and The Coastal Bend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dearmond et al v. Securities And Exchange Commission et al
as 4:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
Tory Dearmond, Cindy Dore, Radjet, LLC and others
Defendant:
Securities And Exchange Commission, Unknown agents of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Unknown agents of the United States Marshal's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
