Cases 11 - 20 of 7,019
Toby v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv11104
Plaintiff:
Rayan Toby
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Wondwossen Dejene et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Wondwossen Dejene and Miguel Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, DOE Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
People of the State of Colorado (PS) et al v. Democratic Party of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Colorado and Kurt Overturf
Defendant:
Democratic Party of Colorado, National (US) Democratic Party, Dominion Voting Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angel Richitelli v. United States Postal Service
as 24-11222
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LIA RICHITELLI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Aficial v. Cuadrado et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Aficial
Defendant:
Edwin Cuadrado, Steve Murphy, Linda Hasten and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409 Suits by and against the Postal Service
Angulo Estanislao v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03198
Plaintiff:
ANGULO ESTANISLAO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plunkett v. San Diego Post Office
as 3:2024cv00696
Defendant:
San Diego Post Office and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Pablo Boines Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act (Definitions)
Holly Harper v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Petitioner:
Holly Harper
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
