Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
as 1:2021cv00191
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OWENS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE and UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. United States Probation Office, Probation Staff et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Probation Staff, State of North Carolina Department of Corrections, Avery Mitchell CI and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandyke v. US District Court Administration et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Vandyke
Defendant:
US District Court Administration, Clerks of Court, Rutherford County Court, Lacy Thornburg and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Probation Office
as 5:2013ct03200
Plaintiff:
Torrance Jones
Defendant:
United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geddings v. United States Probation Office
as 5:2010hc02138
Petitioner:
Kevin L. Geddings
Respondent:
United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Geddings v. United States Probation Office
as 5:2010cv00270
Petitioner:
Kevin L. Geddings
Respondent:
United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARGILL v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ANTHONY CARGILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Sheppard v. Revell et al
as 5:2009ct03044
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Sheppard
Defendant:
Sara Revell, Karen Bernardo, Greg Norton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
