Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 201
United States ex rel Fields v. Bi-State Development Agency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3783
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America ex rel. Eric Fields and United States ex rel Eric Fields
Defendant - Appellant: Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, doing business as Metro
Defendant: Eager Road and Associates, LLC
Movant: United States of America
USA, Ex Rel. Jennifer, et al v. Eric Conn, et al
as 16-6466
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES EX REL. JENNIFER L. GRIFFITH and UNITED STATES EX REL SARAH CARVER
Defendant - Appellant: ERIC C. CONN and ERIC CONN, P.S.C.
Silva-Ramirez, ex rel v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, et al
as 16-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAMUEL DAVID SILVA-RAMIREZ, on behalf of United States of America
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO MUTUO Y BENEFICIENCIA DE PUERTO RICO, ENRIQUE FIERRES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant: MIGUEL ECHENIQUE-IPARRAGUIERRE, ADRIAN COLON-LARACUENTE, RAMON DELGADO-RUIBAL and others
Interested Party: IVAN E. COLON
US, et al v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES, ex rel. ALEX BOOKER and EDMUND HEBRON, ALEX BOOKER, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and EDMUND HEBRON, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Silva-Ramirez, ex rel v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, et al
as 16-1577
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel
Interested Party - Appellant: SAMUEL DAVID SILVA-RAMIREZ, on behalf of United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO MUTUO Y BENEFICIENCIA DE PUERTO RICO, ENRIQUE FIERRES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant: MIGUEL ECHENIQUE-IPARRAGUIERRE, ADRIAN COLON-LARACUENTE, RAMON DELGADO-RUIBAL and others
Interested Party: IVAN E. COLON
Hanlon, et al v. Columbine Management, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES, EX REL ANTHONY HANLON, UNITED STATES, EX REL LINDA DOLLAR and STATE OF COLORADO, EX REL REALTORS
Defendant - Appellee: COLUMBINE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC, a Colorado corporation d/b/a Columbine Health Systems and POUDRE VALLEY HEALTH CARE, INC., a Colorado nonprofit corporation d/b/a Poudre Valley Health System
:
Nargol, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1442
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Defendant - Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Lawton v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETER P. LAWTON, ex rel. UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel. PETER P. LAWTON
Defendant - Appellee: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., f/k/a Takeda Pharmaceutica North America, Inc., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
US ex rel. Anthony Garzione v. PAE Government Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. ANTHONY GARZIONE
Defendant - Appellee: PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., d/b/a PAE
:
Hagerty v. Cyberonics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1304
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Interested Party - Appellant: ANDREW HAGERTY, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: CYBERONICS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?