Cases 21 - 30 of 1,151
Harden v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00789
Petitioner:
Lakesia L. Harden
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mayes v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Keejuan Mayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steele v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00774
Petitioner:
Lacosta Steele
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Dr. Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00735
Petitioner:
Keith Morris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dixon v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00725
Petitioner:
Myreo Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collins v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00701
Petitioner:
Antonio Collins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Penniegraft v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00217
Petitioner:
Eugene Penniegraft
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Khadem v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00661
Petitioner:
Roshanak Khadem
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
