Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,695
USA v. James Leroy
as 24-1841
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES MARK LEROY
USA v. Tamir Douglas
as 24-1850
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TAMIR DOUGLAS
Marshall v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL TORT CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv01931
Plaintiff: Margarita Marshall and UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL TORT CENTER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
USA v. Shawn Tribbett
as 24-1857
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SHAWN TRIBBETT, also known as Marsh, also known as Mellow
USA v. Gregory Makozy, Sr.
as 24-1844
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GREGORY MAKOZY, SR.
USA v. Norman Blackwell
as 24-1840
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NORMAN BLACKWELL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv05863
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT, CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4685 IN THE NAME OF SMART LEARNING, INC., CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0711 IN THE NAME OF HEE AH NAM and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Nain Vasquez Gonzalez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1860
Petitioner: NAIN JOSUE VASQUEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Hocker
as 24-1827
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES E. HOCKER
NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv01889
Plaintiff: NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?