Cases 1 - 10 of 30,629
Mitchum v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Seneca Rynell Mitchum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States v. Carlos Morales Mariscal
as 24-1944
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Ulices Morales Mariscal, also known as Carlos Uleces Rodriges Gamboa, also known as Pecha
United States v. Jeffrey Bailey
as 24-1945
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bailey
United States v. Juan Alapisco-Ochoa
as 24-1947
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Pedro Alapisco-Ochoa
Klott v. The United States of America
as 6:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Adam Klott
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
DDDSalya Inc. v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
DDDSalya Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Food Stamp Act
Ford v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Nicholas Nigel Ford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv02023
Petitioner:
David Wright, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muhammad v. United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents et al
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents, The City of Denver and The City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
