Cases 11 - 20 of 57
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. H.B. Fuller Company
as 5:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
H.B. Fuller Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bailey et al v. Verso Corporation
as 3:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
Clifford Bailey , James Spencer and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Verso Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC et al v. Dana Holding Corporation
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and United Steelworkers Local 9443-02
Defendant:
Dana Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Reynolds et al v. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Donald Reynolds , Norman Yarber and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US Inc., Resolute FP US Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, RONALD D. STRAIT and DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Newman et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles Newman , Gary Johnson and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Centrus Energy Corp., United States Enrichment Corporation and United States Enrichment Corporation Health and Welfare Plan for Retirees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Jackson Hospital Corporation
as 5:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Amicus Curiae:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
