Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 22-1451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ARISTA MUSIC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NONESUCH RECORDS INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
UMG Recordings, Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc
as 1:2021cv02020
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings, Inc., Capitol Records, LLC, Universal Music Corp and others
Defendant:
Charter Communications Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rodsongs, Perren Vibes Music Inc. et al v. Three Kings, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv04964
Plaintiff:
Rodsongs, Perren Vibes Music Inc., Rodsongs, Perren Vibes Music Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Three Kings, LLC and Matthew Roff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gladys Music et al vs Kirkwood Pub & Patio, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01427
Plaintiff:
Gladys Music, Universal-MCA Music Publishing, a Division of Universal Studios, Inc., Colgems-EMI Music Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kirkwood Pub & Patio, Inc. and Hugh Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al v. Universal-MCA Music Publishing, et al
as 08-5273
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL-MCA MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., MCA RECORDS, INC. and others
Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al v. Universal-MCA Music Publishing, et al
as 08-5270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL-MCA MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., individually and as successor to MCA Music Publishing, a division of Universal Studios and as successor to MCA Music Publishing, a division of MCA, Inc.
Defendant:
EPIC RECORDS, INC.
Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al v. Universal-MCA Music Publishing, et al
as 08-5262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL-MCA MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., a division of MCA Inc., as successor to MCA Music Publishing, a division of Universal Studios, Inc. and SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC.
Defendant:
RAG TOP PUBLISHING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
