Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al
as 23-2856
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al
as 23-2855
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, Staffing Agency, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, (NAACP) and others
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HOWARD v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2016cv01576
Plaintiff: AIDAN HOWARD
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, TERESA A. SULLIVAN, CRAIG LITTLEPAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?