Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Valenzuela #172770 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey, Eliza Homer, Mike Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dougall et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02255
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Dougall and Kari Rolfe
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Jeffrey Halvorson, Unknown Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Monk #068675 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2014cv01710
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Monk
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey, Corizon Medical Services, Matt Mussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conroy #096414 v. Ochoa et al
as 2:2014cv01598
Plaintiff:
Jack Charles Conroy
Defendant:
Unknown Ochoa, Unknown Gresh, Unknown Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medina v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv08006
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Varley and others
Plaintiff:
Moreno Jesus Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde # 233841 v. McClellen et al
as 2:2013cv01742
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Clyde
Defendant:
Unknown McClellen, Unknown Hanson, E Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Estrada et al
as 2:2013cv00556
Petitioner:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
Karla Estrada, Unknown Davis, Unknown Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Craig Murray Jones
Defendant:
Jeff Alvarez, Lourdes Hernandez, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkman #133444 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01493
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman, Unknown Credio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
