Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. Portillo et al
as 3:2020cv00821
Defendant:
Unit Manager Unknown Donald, Deputy Warden H. Portillo, Hector Portillo and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittington v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Leon Whittington
Defendant:
Fred Shaw, Unknown Cotton, Unknown La'Flore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claiborne v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00734
Plaintiff:
Tommiel QuenPonta Claiborne
Defendant:
F. Shaw, Unknown Struting, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Defendant:
Unknown Ellis, Unknown Williams, Frank Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. Abangan et al
as 3:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Unknown Abangan, Unknown Rice, Centurion Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredenburg v. Thomas et al
as 3:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles Fredenburg
Defendant:
Unknown Thomas, Unknown Donald, Unknown Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Donald et al
as 4:2015cv00434
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Donald, Diane Unknown, Unknown Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Busher et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Coryell Kantrell Taylor
Defendant:
Unknown Busher, Unknown Hogan, Unknown Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Moss, Jr.
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., J. Buscher, D. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Hubbard v. Kemper Neshoba Regn Corrtl, et al
as 13-60479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY HUBBARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER UNKNOWN SIKES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER UNKNOWN WALKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY RUDOLPH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
